Monday, December 31, 2018

With Rajiv van La Parra confirmed as Boro's first signing of the January transfer window, we spoke to Huddersfield Town fan Luke Beaumont to get the inside track on the Dutch winger. Here's what he had to say:
Rajiv van La Parra signed for us from Wolves but he didn’t arrive with glowing references from their fans; many reacted positively to his departure whilst insisting he had a poor attitude. I didn’t see that straight away.
Ironically, he scored his first goal for us against Wolves and celebrated in great fashion by knee sliding in front of their fans with his finger on his lips. He became an instant hit with Huddersfield fans and we liked what we saw from him.
However, there were instances during his spell with us that his attitude has come into question. During our promotion season, in a game against Reading, he took the ball after we were awarded a penalty (despite not being the designated taker) and he went on to miss.
Last season, in the middle of a relegation battle, he stated he was using Huddersfield as a “stepping stone” to a bigger club which didn’t go down too well with our fans.
I’m not sure what his attitude is like behind the scenes but there has obviously been a falling out between him and David Wagner. There is no other reason to let him leave as he remains the best winger in our squad despite signings such as £12m former Monaco player Adama Diakhaby.
Overall, van La Parra is a useful and exciting player, especially in the Championship. I know Middlesbrough are crying out for an injection of pace and creativity on the flanks and he can certainly provide that.
He likes to run at full-backs and he has a lot of skill and trickery in his locker, although it can become frustrating when he tries to do too much. He isn’t prolific and he doesn’t score as many goals as he perhaps should, but he will provide Boro with flare, pace and creativity that they currently lack.
What do you think of van La Parra? Let us know what you think via our Twitter account, and thanks for reading.

Rajiv van La Parra: the Inside Track

Friday, December 21, 2018

By Daniel Ragusa
As January looms, rumours of wholesale change at the Riverside are flying round.
Britt Assombalonga has emerged as one of those rumours after being recently linked with a move to Crystal Palace by Teamtalk and the Northern Echo.
However, the rumoured deal would involve a swap deal with Connor Wickham, a player who’s only scored seven goals in the last three seasons.
If you are to assess whether Britt should stay or not, the following factors must be considered.
The Goal Record
Simple as that. Britt’s goalscoring record in the EFL speaks for itself. He’s played 209 games and scored 89 times.
This season hasn’t been great for Boro’s number nine so far, who looks as though he’s lacking in confidence.
Montages of his misses over the past two seasons won’t help his confidence and will only serve to create a toxic atmosphere between the players, the club and its fans.
In the modern game, players look at Twitter, and should Britt see a compilation like the one posted recently, it’s not exactly going to help him. Strikers know when they should score and I’m sure that Britt is his own harshest critic.
Despite the stick he’s been getting, Britt has still emerged as our top goalscorer so far this season, having fired in two more than Hugill after a similar number of games.
Six goals in twenty games is nothing to be sniffed at, especially when you consider a lot of those appearances have come as a late substitution, particularly in recent weeks.
Britt scores important goals too – his goal against Millwall to clinch a play-off spot last season springs to mind.
In a team that has failed to catch the eye offensively this season, it makes no sense to sell our best attacking threat.
The Price Tag
Because of his recent drop in form, Britt is highly unlikely to sell for the full £15m that we signed him for.
This means that we are likely to make a loss on him after just one season. If we kept him and he scored more goals then his value would rocket.
On the other hand, though the extent of this may be fairly limited after just six months to a year more, his value could plummet even further if we kept hold of him and his goalscoring record didn’t improve.
Nevertheless, it’s a risk worth taking in my opinion.
The Age
At the age of 26, Britt still has his best footballing years to come, especially at this level.
Think about Daryl Murphy, he’s still playing near the top of the Championship aged 35. Should Britt replicate that, it means he could be playing at this level for at least another nine seasons.
Due to him being of a fairly young age in what is an experienced and aging squad, he appears to be involved with the youngsters at the club.
Being able to gel with both the older and younger generation is key and helps with team chemistry on and off the field too.
The System
For the majority of his career, Britt has successfully played as a lone striker. However, the lone striker system that Middlesbrough currently employ offers width and therefore a lot of crosses.
Assombalonga is decent in the air, however it’s not his biggest strength, and as a result the current system isn’t particularly well-suited to him.
He needs a system that can play that killer through ball on the ground for him to run onto, rather than hope that the ball falls to him in the box from a ricochet.
We could have Cristiano Ronaldo upfront, but if he’s not getting the service how is he going to score?
Against QPR, Britt was playing on the left wing, a position in which he was destined to fail. His strengths aren’t dribbling, pace and crossing, so why play him there?
The Movement
He may not work as hard for the team as Jordan Hugill, but Assombalonga knows how to move off the ball and create opportunities for his team.
A lot of his movement goes unnoticed. He plays on the shoulder of the last defender and is always wanting the ball played through rather than to feet to then lay off to the midfield.
The second half against Blackburn was the best we’ve seen from an attacking point of view for a while (and it was with ten men).
We had two upfront, in Britt and Hugill, with the latter offering the ball to feet and looking to flick it on to the former.
He only scored the one goal, but we created clear-cut chances and, on another night, we could have scored three of four. If you give Britt three chances in a game, he’s going to score at least one. Can the same be said of any of Boro’s other strikers?
The Manager
Tony Pulis has made his thoughts clear on Britt.
In his interviews he is always on his back saying he should score more, however when he does score like he did against Blackburn to salvage a point, he doesn’t give him the credit he deserves.
Assombalonga often starts as a sub in Pulis’ side, but should Tony not be here by the end of the season and we bring in a different manager with a different style of play, it could suit Britt and we could have the 25 goal a season striker we paid £15m for.
It’s difficult to understand how a manager who finds it difficult to tactically organise an attack can criticise strikers who are starved of any chances to prove their worth.
The Curse
It’s becoming increasingly typical of Boro to sign a natural, proven goalscorer yet somehow manage to make them worse.
Think of Jordan Rhodes. When we signed him, we thought we’d finally got the guy that was going to be a Bernie Slaven-esque attacking talisman. Although he did score very important goals for the club, we destroyed his confidence and ended up shipping him off to Sheffield Wednesday where his career has hit a downwards spiral (until recently with Norwich).
Alvaro Negredo, Premier League winner and an outstanding talent, was starved of goalscoring chances when he got to the Riverside. He’s recently ended up playing in Dubai.
Perhaps it’s just a coincidence but it seems to be becoming a common trend with Boro’s forwards.
The Alternatives
So, it’s February 1st, the transfer window is over. Britt has moved on, who have Boro got upfront?
Hugill is a decent forward who works hard and has great hold-up play, however he lacks Britt’s clinical touch.
Gestede is decent in the air and a good option as a plan B but hasn’t proven he can be the number nine.
Fletcher has struggled to make a huge impact on Teesside and could come good in the future but isn’t ready to be Boro’s focal point yet.
Braithwaite is as good as gone.
We could sign someone else, but who?
Money is tight and Boro won’t spend big, so we’re likely to look for a loan – a short-term solution to a long-term problem, Boro’s lack of goals.
The funny thing is that if Boro were to sell Assombalonga, they’d likely to be looking to replace him with an identical striker who has a similar goalscoring record, so it doesn’t make much sense to sell him.
The Conclusion
Trying to fit square pegs in round holes is not going to work, we should find a system that suits the players we have at our disposal.
Britt is a striker who runs in behind, not a hold up striker, and most certainly not a winger.
Play to his strengths and watch him thrive, prove his worth and be key to our promotion chances this season.
Keeping him on Boro’s books has more benefits than drawbacks for the club.
After all, Britt’s not the problem; it’s the system he plays in.

Britt's not the Problem

Sunday, December 16, 2018

By Tim Sigsworth
Over the course of this entire season, concerns about Boro’s performances have continually built up. It seems, after yesterday evening’s dismal 2-1 defeat to Queens Park Rangers, that those concerns have reached their highest point yet – and they aren’t showing any signs of letting up.
As Tony Pulis’ side have slumped from one disappointing result to another, questions over his future have been asked at an ever increasing rate and have now, with the club eight points outside the top two, reached a point where they can no longer be ignored. It is therefore necessary to ask whether he is the right man to take Boro forward, something which this article intends to do.
Defeat to Queens Park Rangers yesterday saw Boro extend their winless run to four games and make it just two points gained from a possible twelve during that same four-game period. Such a record, as well as the toxically pessimistic atmosphere which surrounds the club at the moment, gave Boro’s defeat at Loftus Road an air of inevitability, an air of “typical Boro” which reflects the faith (or lack of) fans have in Pulis at the moment.
You can look for the positives and see that Boro have only lost four games this season, remain in the play-offs and have conceded the fewest goals in the division.
However, this is a strenuous argument. If you compare Garry Monk’s league record with Pulis’, Boro acquired 10 wins and 35 points in the 23 games they played under the now-Birmingham City manager. In comparison, Pulis’ Boro have won 9 games and 36 points from the 22 games played so far this season.
Essentially, Boro have gained one point and gone a round further in the League Cup after a year and two entire transfer windows under Pulis. That isn’t good enough for any team who want to be taken seriously as promotion contenders.
Moreover, this marginally better points tally has been acquired at a cost. With defensive solidity preferred to attacking freedom, Boro have struggled under Pulis to set the pulses going and excite the fans with their safety-first, unadventurous, lack-of-initiative style of play.
Under Pulis, Boro are frustrating to watch, although for entirely different reasons than under Monk (think crass attacking ineptitude versus crass defensive ineptitude). Frankly, Pulis has so far failed to find a balance between exciting football and defensive prowess as Aitor Karanka did so successfully during the 2014/15 and 2015/16 seasons.
Furthermore, Boro have been tactically outsmarted far too often recently. Blown away by Dean Smith’s Aston Villa and outfought and outthought for the majority of the games against QPR, Blackburn Rovers, and Preston North End, Pulis’ tactical mistakes and misjudgements have cost Boro in the past few weeks.
Though blame for Boro’s poor performances can be placed with Pulis, the players available to him also play a part. In key areas, Boro lack what’s necessary; there is little pace and power on the wings, the forwards aren’t clinical enough and there is little to no depth at full-back and on the flanks. This is attributable to Boro’s sub-par summer recruitment, something which is partly the manager’s fault.
Pulis has the final say on transfers and takes the lead on what type of player we sign. Additionally, his pulling power is fairly limited, especially for the dynamic attacking players which the team is crying out for at the minute. Whenever Boro have gone in for a big-name attacking signing during his tenure, they’ve missed out – think Mitrovic, Grabban, Abraham and Bolasie. These players know his style of play, how they’ll likely have very limited attacking freedom and how defensive duties will be substantial under him. It’s therefore no wonder we’re chronically short of attacking options when Pulis is manager of the club.
However, the poor recruitment argument is a two-sided one. At the end of the day, it isn’t Pulis who lacks the funds to appropriately finance a promotion push, it’s Steve Gibson. It isn’t Pulis who makes Teesside and the surrounding area an unattractive prospect for players to move to in comparison to other areas of the country, and it isn’t Pulis who is responsible for the plethora of poor signings made over the last two or three seasons – many of which remain at the club.
Boro’s scouting and recruitment systems have not been good enough for a long time now. Think Dwight Tiendalli, Kike Sola, Bernardo Espinosa and Adlene Guedioura under Aitor Karanka and Marvin Johnson and Connor Roberts under Garry Monk (the list could go on). This is something which Pulis is looking to improve. Ahead of the QPR match he spoke of adopting a buy-low, sell-high policy imitative of Brentford and Norwich City, a statement which reveals two important factors which must be considered in any assessment of Pulis’ future.
Firstly, such an approach is further evidence of the long-term nature of his appointment and the mandate for change which Pulis has been granted by Steve Gibson and the Middlesbrough board. With changes already made regarding the relationships between the first-team and the medical team and academy respectively, Pulis appears to have the confidence of the board and therefore sacking him before he has the opportunity to reap what he has sowed likely doesn’t align with the club’s vision for the future.
However, the fact that Pulis has begun a process of change doesn’t mean that another manager wouldn’t be able to come in and finish it. In that regard, another appointment would be possible and could be effective, but it’s unlikely given Gibson’s confidence in Pulis and trademark loyalty to his managers.
Secondly, it is further evidence, if any was needed, of the club’s financial insecurity. After burning through the Premier League money in the summer of 2017 (£7m for Ashley Fletcher, anyone?), this summer’s transfer policy was one of ‘sell-to-buy’ and there wasn’t much action on the transfer front, with the exclusion of Aden Flint and Paddy McNair, until the sales of Ben Gibson and Adama Traore. When Boro did manage to raise the capital required to make signings, the price tags of certain players, such as Mo Besic and Jed Wallace, were too excessive for permanent deals to be negotiated. With the club now targeting players for £200k, £300k or £1m (as Pulis said in his pre-QPR presser), it is clear for all to see that Boro’s coffers aren’t particularly strong and the club is looking to minimise its costs.
So, with a long-term, low-cost approach favoured, it’s unlikely that Steve Gibson will see fit to sack Pulis. especially as he seems to have a strong relationship with the Boro boss. If you consider that the Welshman is likely on high wages, paying him off, as well as financing the subsequent recruitment process for a new manager, would likely incur costs which the club wouldn’t want to face given its current financial state.
In assessing Pulis’ future, you must also look from the perspective of a potential replacement. With Pulis’ long-term changes interrupted before they provide their intended dividends, a new manager would have the same limited squad and the same limited opportunities to change the squad as Pulis. It would hardly be an attractive prospect in that sense.
Furthermore, the new manager would be the fifth to manage Boro in the last two years, a statistic which would undeniably cast Steve Gibson’s reputation as a patient, old-school-style chairman into doubt. If there is to be little money available to managers of the club for the next few years, Gibson will have to rely on his well-renowned status within the game in order to make strong managerial appointments, something which sacking another manager would do harm to.
Although this reason may smack of self-interest, having a strong manager at the helm will play a key role in the performances of the club over the long-term and limit the negative effects of Boro’s uneasy financial situation.
However, appointing a new manager with a more positive, attacking style of play would have its benefits. Though you may argue that Boro’s current squad is weak and unsuited to an attacking style of play, there is undoubtedly technical skill in the squad which could be weaponised to devastating effect in a progressive, open-minded, attacking style of football.
George Saville and Lewis Wing would likely prosper with freedom to roam in midfield, as they did in the 2017/18 season with Millwall and at the start of this season with Boro respectively, whilst Marcus Tavernier and Martin Braithwaite could perform very well indeed if they were also allowed to play with freedom and the confidence which comes with it.
Moreover, a new manager would also be without Pulis’ defensive reputation, and therefore signing the attacking players the team need as well as retaining those already within the squad would be a much easier task. They may not be able to bring about immediate change given the nature of the squad and of Boro’s finances but having a transfer window to begin to mould their squad and starting to play less archaically rigid football would be hugely beneficial in terms of attendances, atmosphere and the strength of the squad.
Tony Pulis’ football has been dire, and it just isn’t fun to watch Boro anymore – it’s a chore. Change is needed, and whether that comes through Pulis or a new manager, Steve Gibson needs to act. After several years of mismanagement, failure and broken promises, Boro’s chairman is relying on his reputation on an ever greater scale as calls for his head begin to emerge from the shadows.
As such, the decision over Pulis’ future is huge. Get it wrong, and Boro will spend another three to four years in the Championship wilderness, scrimping and saving as memories of the club’s golden era drift further and further away. In such circumstances, defending Gibson would become an increasingly difficult task.
There is a viable argument for Pulis to leave the club now. Boro’s performances are poor, our tactics are ineffective, recruitment has been sub-par, attendances are sliding and the team have minimally increased their points tally in comparison with last season. After a year and two transfer windows, a man of Pulis’ experience should be doing far better than that.
Though it is not entirely his fault and other factors external to him should be considered in any assessment of his performance, much of the discontent felt by the fans towards the manager and the club at the moment could be minimised and possibly even entirely reverted if a positive, attack-minded manager was brought in. Attacking player development would also come on leaps and bounds, too.
However, despite the grievances many feel towards Pulis, I believe it is unlikely that Steve Gibson will part ways with him. Pulis was appointed with a long-term view in mind, he was given a mandate for significant change and the two individuals clearly have a strong relationship. He has made changes behind the scenes and has spent very little money, two factors which will shine him in a favourable light in the board’s mind. With these signs of efficiency added to his reputation as a long-term manager, Pulis is probably seen as the right man to take Boro forward into their cash-strapped future by the Hurworth Hierarchy.
Nevertheless, you cannot avoid the fact that Boro’s results, performances and attendances have only worsened over the course of the season. Though the time may not be right for change in Gibson’s mind, he must act if improvements aren’t seen in those regards soon. He’d have my full support if he was to fire Pulis now, and he’ll have it if he chooses to do so later on. After all, I’d rather watch entertaining football in an atmosphere of hope for the future than the dull and decrepit Pulisball which is unlikely to get us anywhere that’s worth being by the end of the season.
However, any change of management must come with further change behind the scenes. Boro’s issues run deeper than the dugout, and though this doesn’t relieve Pulis of blame, a decision to remove him from his position must be met with a simultaneous reassessment of the entire club’s operations. Even at the very top.

Pulis v. the People: the Case Against Boro's Boss

Wednesday, November 28, 2018

By Michael Richardson
It’s not often a goalkeeper is attributed with the “best player at the club” tag by supporters, but Darren Randolph has certainly become one of these infrequencies as fans begin to realise just how pivotal he is to Boro’s success.
Here are just a few reasons why our Irish keeper is one of the best in the business:
The Stats
If my memory serves me correctly, it was Shakira who once said that stats don’t lie. And Boro fans can agree that this is unquestionably the case for our Bray-born shot-stopper.
He of course tops the rankings for most clean sheets (11), and fewest goals conceded per game (0.5) – but you already know all of that. His saving stats are the real jaw-droppers as he makes 5.67 saves per goal, almost one save more than Swansea’s Erwin Mulder (4.63) in second, and over three saves more than table-topping Norwich’s Tim Krul (2.38). Not bad.
He also bails us out regularly, making 51 saves in total this season, which is either a testament to his excellent goalkeeping or a warning sign for the defence. Randolph showed off his cat-like reflexes to deny Brentford’s Josh Dasilva at the weekend, amongst other solid saves, which crucially secured all three points as he has done many a time this season.
Although he’s not perfect, ranking just 11th in the league for goal kick success (48.6%) and claim success (90.9%) - the latter being understandable for a relatively small goalkeeper, the collective stats certainly show one thing – Randolph is right up there with Jack Butland in the gladiator-esque battle of the Championship shot-stoppers, and has definitely been one of Boro’s best performers this season.
Who’s Been Better?
You would find it a hard task to pinpoint a player who’s been more vital, more consistent and who has won more points for Boro this season than Randolph. From the wonder save against Brentford to the last-minute point-sealer to deny Barry Douglas at Leeds, he has been pivotal in ensuring Boro remain in promotion contention this season.
Even top performers Adam - ‘Manchester Makélélé’ - Clayton and Stewy - ‘Nunthorpe Nedved’ - Downing have had poor games this season, and I believe Randolph to be the only Middlesbrough player to be consistently good, if not excellent, at all times, especially when the going has got tough in recent weeks.
Gone are the days of mis-kicks against QPR and failing to defend his far post away at Bristol City; these have now been replaced by displays of solidity and composure. And although I’m not trying not to portray our keeper as some save-calculating robot, he sure seems to be pretty close to it.

Darren Randolph: Boro's Best Player

Tuesday, November 20, 2018

By Ian Smith
As a Boro fan, or just a football fan in general, you’re likely to have a hero or two.
Over the years I’ve been enthralled by many players; Gazza, Le Tissier, Giggs, Ronaldo (the original) and many, many more.
However, when it comes to heroes, those that play for your Club are always that extra bit special obviously.
Speak to any Boro fan, especially those from the last 25 years or so, and they’ll tell you Juninho is their favourite player, and in many ways he’s the archetypal hero.
A maverick with the ball, a big kid (or little, but you get what I mean), he played for the fun of the game, and it showed in each of his performances. The Little Fella had a big heart, and his hero status was cemented upon slumping to the turf on that fateful afternoon at Elland Road. The pain and anguish, as well as tears, etched on his face told us he was one of us, he felt the hurt.
Ordinarily you’d expect someone like me, a fan who grew up in the 90’s, to cite the Brazilian as his absolute hero, but you’d be wrong.
No, my hero is a little less obvious, especially among the modern day fan, but he’s by no means any less of a hero than yours.
Brucie Babe
Stuart Edward Ripley first captured my attention at the turn of the 90’s. A product of Brucie Rioch’s famed and revered ‘Brucie Babes’, he’d been a regular in a Boro shirt since the mid 80’s following the Club’s near death experience.
Along with the likes of Gary’s, Hamilton, Parkinson and Pallister, as well as Colin Cooper and of course Tony ‘Mogga’ Mowbray, Ripley was part of a golden era of talent thrust into the team in the Club’s time of need.
Part of a side that won back to back promotions, elevating the Club from the old Third Division to the First Division in just a couple of seasons, he’s arguably a Boro legend given the importance placed on that period of success following their huge flirtation with extinction. They were all legends. As fans look back fondly on a side that shaped so many careers, many whom went on to have successful ones elsewhere, Ripley was of those whose career took off following his early years as a professional in the red and white of Boro.
My memories of him don’t really go any further back than 1990, and even then they’re decidedly sketchy.
It’s odd in some ways to see him as my Boro hero on the face of it; after all I can only recall the latter stages of his time at Ayresome Park, the 1990/91 & 1991/92 seasons being the absolute limit of my first-hand knowledge of him.
But what a couple of seasons they were for me.
The ideal model
As a youngster I did pretty much what most lads do with a football; I ran with it. And ran. And ran some more.
I loved nothing more than getting the ball and just darting past players as quickly as I could, although what I was going to do with the ball when it came to making a decision was a different matter.
Yet, watching Ripley was almost an education as well as a joyful experience. He was the ideal model for how I wanted to play.
It always seemed like the first thought he had when he got the ball was to put his head down, and then run with it. Strong as an ox, he was a formidable presence for any full back to contend with. Big and burly, but not clumsy, he was also pretty quick when in full flow.
Growing up in Doncaster, I left many scratching their heads as I would constantly reference Slaven or indeed Ripley when football cropped in conversation (as it always seemed to).
As a lad I was tall, but not strong, yet with pace I felt I could outstrip anyone. Even from a young age I would watch Ripley’s movement, often pretending to be him on the school playground whilst all my mates were trying to be Giggsy or John Barnes. As I would cut inside, much like Ripley did to great success, I would begin to cross balls (although my inability to master the use of my right foot like him meant a lot of playing the ball with the outside of my left).
It was about that time I realised I wanted to be a winger, and it was all down to Ripley.
He excited me with the way he played. No fancy flicks or step overs, or any of the histrionics you see these days, he was a no frills, but by no means boring, winger who knew what he wanted to do and he did it.
Much like nowadays, I obsessed about Boro. I had all the VHS season reviews, watched every snippet of Tyne Tees tele we could get (my Dad managed to angle our aerial to receive local TV from Middlesbrough).
Quite often I’d see Ripley interviewed and his whole demeanour, his unassuming persona just resonated with me. Not only did I like watching him, but I thoroughly enjoyed listening to him. He felt like a departure from what I perceived a footballer to be; someone with a god-like aura, a flamboyant, confident figure.
Instead, he came across as a shy and modest guy, quietly uncomfortable with the media obligations but almost too nice to say no. I liked this; it felt like he was representing people like me. Shy lads who whilst wanting to play football, didn’t have that loud and brash side to them, he was just a regular guy.
But yet he wasn’t, he was an extraordinary guy.
We put our heroes on a pedestal, and the old saying goes ‘you should never meet your heroes’ – but I did, and how fortunate I was too.
Like meeting Father Christmas
During the 91/92 season my family were nominated to for an award issued by the Club for ‘Best Travelling Supporters of The Season’. Basically the Club back then recognised the commitment and sacrifices fans went through to get to games, choosing to honour those who travelled from far and wide.
Whilst Doncaster isn’t a million miles away, a 180 mile round trip every other weekend is some effort on my parent’s part, and both my brother and I were fortunate to be given the opportunity many kids didn’t get – to see the team they supported on a regular basis.
As it happens, we won the award.
Proud as punch, especially my Dad who was originally from Yearby Village just near Middlesbrough, we were invited to a game (of which the opposition escapes me) as guests of the Club and afforded the hospitality treatment.
As part of the award we got to meet our favourite players. As you can imagine, I was pretty giddy.
That giddiness however turned to nervousness and shyness, as the large figure of Ripley entered the hospitality suite after the game.
I don’t remember what he said to me, or indeed what I said to him (I probably muttered something inaudible), but he came across as such a great bloke, just how I’d imagined. When the time came for a photo opportunity, I was asked if I’d like to sit on his knee. I did, and I’ll be honest I was so shy the picture looks as if I’m hating it, however inside it was like I’d met Father Christmas. It didn’t matter to me that Jamie Pollock was sat next to me too, it almost seemed irrelevant.
Only the other day I dug out the picture the Club photographer took, a blown up one that sat pride and place for many years in my bedroom, but now packed away with lots of other Boro memorabilia at my parents’ house. It took me back to that era, that day, and like any Boro nostalgic trip it gave me a warm and fuzzy feeling, that classic sense of escapism.
Classic throwback
It took me back to the goal he scored against Southend, picking the ball up on the half way line, cutting inside and driving forward before smashing the ball into the top corner from 20 yards out – real hero stuff.
His goal against Peterborough in the League Cup quarter final, another driving run, this time into the box, twisting and turning he lost his marker before whipping an effort into the far corner, keeper unmoved.
Cross after cross after cross, more often than not on the head of a red shirt before hitting the back of the net. He was a classic winger, who nowadays would be seen as something of a throwback. For all the extravagant and outlandish skill you see these days, there’s nothing quite like watching a player getting their head down and running at the opposition.
When Adama Traore was doing it last season, my mind cast back to Ripley. Of course, they have their difference in styles, but in the end they both shared the ultimate aim – to beat the opposition and get as close to the opposing penalty area and make something happen as quickly as possible.
It’s that pure unadulterated joy got from such play that captured my attention as a 5-yr-old, shaping my aims as a child, and whilst I didn’t quite make the grade (nowhere near in all fairness), and I didn’t quite master the art of being both footed (again, nowhere near), I like to think he had an impact on how I enjoyed the game.
I wanted to be a footballer, that much was a given, but I wanted to be just like Stuart Ripley.
And that, to me, is what makes him my Boro hero.

Stuart Ripley - The classic throwback, my Boro hero