Friday, June 28, 2019

By Nathan Rayner
After the official announcement of Jonathan Woodgate’s appointment as the Middlesbrough boss, many fans, not only of the club but also across the footballing world, are intrigued to see how the new project will play out.
Other names such as Slavisa Jokanovic, John Terry and Nigel Pearson had been linked with the Riverside hot-seat; however, it was Woody who had been the front-runner throughout the search and who would eventually be named ‘the outstanding candidate to head up the role’. The news of the Teessider being given the job had initially been taken with a mixed reception, though.
A section of supporters had viewed the appointment as one with a feeling of a ‘jobs for the boys’, though, once analysed in greater depth, Woodgate being promoted to the position of Head Coach can be seen as a very bold and exciting move.
With him being given the job, an opportunity to develop a new identity has arisen. The Club seem more than keen to move away from the ever-changing models from previous seasons and identify a clear plan that will outline the philosophy of the Club moving forward into the future.
In previous years, Boro have thrown everything at trying to gain promotion back to the top flight; The Monk era is the most visible period in which the club spent large figures on transfer fees for Championship players that have failed to impress. He failed to build a relationship with the fans at all during his tenure and was sacked only six months into a three-year contract.
Following this was the Pulis regime, in which Boro were much more fiscally-prudent, with not a lot of players being signed, as the Club felt the effects of over-spending and tried to avoid being struck by Financial Fair Play. However, despite the managerial change, there is a case to argue that Boro’s style of football was much more difficult to enjoy under the Welshman than it was under Garry Monk.
In his opening press conference on the day of his appointment, it was clearly expressed by Gibson, Bausor, Bevington and Woodgate himself that the board wanted to build “a style of play that will be recognisable as Middlesbrough Football Club”.
A much more attacking and dynamic system going forward, alongside a unique blend of assertive defensive prowess, is exactly the style of play that Woody is looking to implement into his new-look Boro side.
Woodgate explained that he wants his team to attack as quickly as possible when they have the ball but to also “win it back as quickly as you can” when possession is lost. The most successful Championship teams in recent times have been ones that operate with a high pressing system and then strike quickly with vibrant attacking football. In recent seasons, teams such as Norwich and Fulham have successfully gained promotion to the Premier League by playing a risky yet very effective brand of football.
These sides were renowned in the Championship for their brilliant goals-scored records in their promotion seasons, something that Woody desires to implement. He explained in his presser that “you go up by scoring goals”, something which will present a stark contrast to the ‘one goal lead will suffice’ style which Tony Pulis played last season.
The way in which Woodgate will set up his new outfit is currently unknown and we will probably have to wait until the first games of pre-season for an early indication of what our formation and player roles will be. However, a much more expansive side that looks to take the game to their opponents is what has been promised.
A side like Derby County of last season is what I envisage us to be like. are common features of the style of football that has been widely proved to be the most effective at Championship level in recent seasons, if it is gotten right.
Despite this marked change in philosophy, a reboot of the current squad does not necessarily need to happen; however, some key areas will need to be addressed if Woody is to play the way that he would like to.
The former England man expressed his desire to integrate “young, fresh, vibrant players with a desire and a hunger to improve” into his side with the huge possibility that some of these players will have come through the Academy system. Youngsters such as Nathan Wood, Ste Walker and Djed Spence have been on the fringes of the first team for around a season now, with some standout performances for the Under-23’s pushing them towards the first-team squad.
With Woody understanding the pros and flaws of every player at the Club from under-12’s upwards, it's probable that we are going to see various Academy prospects making senior appearances during the upcoming season.
This will likely coincide with transfer dealings this summer as Steve Gibson has vowed to fully back his fellow Teessider in the transfer market.
Questioned on whether he will provide his new associate with necessary transfer funds, Gibson replied, “of course we will, we have a history of doing that don’t we?” A Middlesbrough that has a well-funded and well-functioning yet financially-efficient recruitment policy appears to hold all of the ingredients for success on the face of it.
It has been widely stated over the last few months that the Club are not as financially strong as they have been within previous years due to excessive spending in an attempt to bounce back to the top flight as soon as possible and also as a result of parachute payments from the Premier League running out.
However, Gibson was also quick to state that the club’s resources are not as limited as first thought, explaining that “when you say finances are tight, I’m not quite sure about that”. Despite this though, it does seem that Boro are going to try to be shrewder in the transfer market and attempt to pick out little-known ‘gems’ that can be utilised efficiently within Woody’s new system and quite possibly turned on for a profit.
Nevertheless, if the past is anything to go by, Steve Gibson will back Jonathan Woodgate to the hilt in this regard.
Other former managers that have entered their first managerial positions with Boro have been supported throughout their tenure, but most importantly, given time to implement their ideas.
Arguably the Club’s most successful managers; Jack Charlton, Bruce Rioch, Bryan Robson, Steve McClaren, and even Aitor Karanka, were all given a fair crack at the whip. The spells that those men had at Boro were some of the most enjoyable times to watch and support the Club and this what is needed now.
Gibson has promised that “we will be patient” with Woody and his new system and also that he is “not going to put that kind of pressure” on the coaching staff to gain promotion in their first season. It is a different project at Boro and rightfully, needs time to function and for a team to gel into ‘Woodgate-ball’.
The fans need to stick with it as well. Not everything will go our way this season. There will be many ups and downs in terms of results, moments on the pitch and off the pitch. But in “a season of change” on the pitch and behind the scenes, the fans’ ideology needs to change. We aren’t entitled to a spot in the Premier League next season. We are going to have to work for it.
So get behind Woody and the boys this season and you may be pleasantly surprised to see where we end up.

A New Beginning: What can we Expect from Woodgate’s Boro?

Tuesday, June 25, 2019

By Daniel Ragusa
Over the years, Middlesbrough have had some great skippers. Tony Mowbray, Nigel Pearson, Gareth Southgate and Grant Leadbitter all immediately spring to mind.
Each of them had success at the club, and they were all humble whilst wearing the armband - none put themselves before the team, instead giving 100% for the team whilst keeping everyone in check.
Last season, Boro’s captaincy started off with Leadbitter, before being brandished to Friend, Downing and Mikel following his departure.
So, with Leadbitter, Downing and Mikel having all left the club, the time is right to question who will take on the armband for Jonathan Woodgate’s Middlesbrough side. Here’s a look at some possible candidates…
George Friend
The most obvious choice.
Friend has had a great influence on both the team and the area since joining the club in 2012. He’s proven that he’s a model professional and a figure for youngsters to look up to.
However, in recent seasons, it’s not exactly been plain sailing for Boro’s No. 3. He’s not as effective when attacking as he once was, but perhaps that’s Pulis’ fault, and he seems to get caught out at the back more frequently than he used to. Many fans have shown their frustration at his performances and the club’s inability to find a suitable alternative in several transfer windows.
With George being the only recognised left-back in the squad, Boro will surely have to strengthen in the position this summer, and there is a possibility that the new signing could replace him in the Starting XI.
However, even with this in mind, it would be a bit of a shock if Friend didn’t retain some form of leadership role in the squad considering his undying love for the club and the area as well as his experience of success in this division and the recent departures of senior dressing room figures like Gibson, Leadbitter, Downing, Dimi and Mikel.
Darren Randolph
Why not give it to the best player we have?
Captains are often figures for other players to look up to and aspire to be like. If each player matched Randolph’s level of performance from last campaign then we would all be in for a treat next season.
Often seen barking orders at his backline, he nevertheless portrays calmness through his assured displays and, as goalkeeper, can also see the entire pitch. His ability to set the tone for the other ten players on the field through his performances and to assess the entire game are positive characteristics for a captain.
Also, with the Republic of Ireland international likely to attract mass interest over the course of the summer, offering him captaincy could sweeten the deal for him to stay on Teesside.
Adam Clayton
Clayton is a divisive player. In my opinion he’s crucial to our set-up and one of the best holding midfielders in the league but to others, he’s what’s holding the team back. Fans often get on a player’s back if they think the players first thought is to retain possession rather than attack. However, sometimes keeping the ball is a lot more important.
He’s a character on and off the pitch, isn’t afraid to make his opinions heard, has played alongside Leadbitter for years and is one of our longest serving players - surely these factors all contribute to strong leadership qualities?
He’s another one of those adopted Teessiders, and he understands how much the club means to the area after going through the same highs and lows that we have had over the years.
Jonny Howson
The ‘Leeds Cafu’ is one of the hardest workers on the pitch whenever he wears the Boro shirt. He knows what it takes to get promoted out of this division and has experience with the armband at both Leeds and Norwich.
Last season he proved that he was also versatile, playing numerous different positions without complaining.
Perhaps he’s not the loudest player on the pitch, but he plays by example and often sets the tone for his side, whilst his energy will be needed to be replicated in each position if Boro are to change their philosophy to a more exciting one.
Aden Flint
This one may come as a surprise; I think he’ll be the first to admit didn’t have the best first season on Teesside since joining from Bristol City last summer.
He’ll also probably accept that he should have scored more than just the one, and perhaps his confidence wasn’t completely there in front of goal.
However, he was still part of a back-line which boasted the joint least goals conceded in the Championship last season, he’s not afraid to be vocal and get his point across to the rest of the team and he also played almost every game last season.
Maybe not the front-runner, but certainly a candidate to acknowledge.
Dael Fry
What better way is there to prove the new change in philosophy than to hand the armband to the future of the club? The lad may just be 21 years old but has already proven his Championship class over several seasons.
Woodgate has already spoken about his ambitions of bringing in a more youthful approach at Middlesbrough and Dael is the most experienced of our youth players.
It has worked wonders in the past with Ben Gibson often taking the armband during his time with the club, and also on a greater scale with Matthijs de Ligt captaining Ajax at just the age of 18. Of course, I’m not comparing Fry to the Dutch defender in terms of skill level, just that he could take the captaincy as de Ligt did.
Admittedly he isn’t the most vocal on the pitch and giving him this role could put too much pressure on his development but if the choice is going to be bold, there isn’t a better one than Dael.
A New Signing?
There is of course a chance that a new signing could take the captain’s armband.
It’s not out of the realms of possibility that someone like Ben Gibson could return or, alternatively, another natural leader is signed. After all, John Obi Mikel joined in January and took the armband at the back end of last season and history could repeat itself again.
My Choice
For me however, I believe club captain should be George Friend, with Darren Randolph and Adam Clayton taking the roles of vice-captain and third choice captain respectively.
George has proven worthy of the armband with his dedication to the team and the area. He’d wear it with pride and represent Teesside in a positive light. As well as this, should the referee summon the captain of each team for a situation in the game, there won’t be many better sweet talkers than Friend in the whole of the EFL.
Giving Randolph vice-captaincy may be enough to persuade him to stay. If Friend doesn’t play every game, you can guarantee Darren will and the shot-stopper would be a great character to take on the armband in his absence.
Clayton deserves to be in the running for the armband and making him third-choice would reward his dedication to this club over the years and I’m sure he’d relish the role if he was made captain on the pitch.
Who’s your ideal choice for captaincy next season? Let us know via Twitter.

Who should be Boro's next captain?

Friday, June 14, 2019

By Tim Sigsworth
Jonathan Woodgate, Boro through and through, has this morning been announced as the new manager of Middlesbrough Football Club.
When rumours about the appointment began to swirl several weeks ago, they were roundly condemned by a large majority of Boro supporters, many of whom used poorly informed and somewhat illogical arguments based on rumours from over a decade ago to do so.
However, following a four-week recess which saw the subsidence of immediate negative reactions, the development of rational debate and Woody’s continued presence as the leading contender for the job, attitudes towards a prospective Woodgate revolution have warmed.
Though pockets of resistance remain, namely in some quarters of the Gazette’s comments section and among anti-Gibson social media users, this mass shift towards pro-Woodgate positions bodes well for the future and will be vital if the appointment is to stand any chance of realising its huge potential.
It is a shift which is deserved, too, not just out of courtesy or purely because he is one of our own, but because it is grounded in reality.
For under Woodgate, an opportunity emerges to build on Pulis’ internal reforms, to synchronise the entire club under one youth-, passing- and development- oriented footballing philosophy and to move away from the ‘promotion or bust’ and ‘spend your way to success’ model of the past two seasons towards a fiscally-prudent, rough diamond-centred recruitment policy.
Doing so will facilitate a club ethos which will outlast individual managers and ensure more sustainable long-term development on and off the pitch. On the basis of the initial announcement, which mentions a desire to “develop a new identity”, and on what Woodgate himself said in his first interview, it seems likely that this is what the club intend to do
“We want to get fans on the edge of their seat. We want as many fans back in the stadium as we can by playing attacking, exciting football with high pressure, pressing in different areas. I’m not just talking about gung-ho, I’m talking about players running the extra yard, knowing when to press, how to press and I’m looking to bring kids through the system and that’s really important for this football club.”
“In the last few years we’ve maybe gone away from doing that, but I know every player from the Under-12s to Under-23s to first team level and I know what they can do. I won’t be frightened to put a young player in and the fans can start connecting with them, because they have a hunger and a desire to learn and go forward.”
With experience working within recruitment from his time as a scout and analyst with Liverpool during the 2016/17 season, good contacts from his reputation, his playing career and his post-playing career and respect from Boro’s current playing squad as a figure of authority thanks to his time as club captain and as first-team coach under Agnew and Pulis and as an individual well-known and well-liked within the club and the academy with a positive footballing philosophy (just look at his, Neil Maddison and Curtis Fleming’s testimony), Woody is an insider who possesses all the tools and attributes to lead a new-look, spectator-entertaining MFC to success.
After all, the club’s most successful and influential managers have often been those given time and patience to make widescale changes, regardless of limited managerial experience. Think Charlton, Rioch and Robson, even McClaren and Karanka.
These managers may not have always achieved the ultimate successes or ended their spells on Teesside in the best possible manner, but we certainly had fun along the way.
And that is exactly what Boro need right now.
Ever since everything began to go south for Aitor after Christmas 2016, undercurrents of division have existed within the fanbase. Although forced momentarily underground by post-Agnew and post-Monk optimism, these deep fault lines of opinion, widened by the vitriol and personal attacks of social media vitriol, have repeatedly re-emerged in ever more toxic forms − whether it be during the last few months of AK’s reign, from September onwards during the Monk era or throughout the entirety of last season under Tony Pulis.
Woodgate, and his backroom staff of Leo Percovich, Danny Coyne and Robbie Keane, have the pedigree, knowledge and footballing philosophy required to unite the supporters around a team which, as a blend of academy prospects and seasoned pros proud to play entertaining football for a badge they are committed to, makes our area proud.
Do that, and it’s likely that there will be a re-emergence of positivity, unison and hope for the future, regardless of financial constraints. However, continued success will require a conscious effort from supporters to resist the temptation to over-react and make ‘told you so’-type comments as soon as results go slightly awry. Remaining patient and continuing to back the team with gusto is far more important than getting a few likes on Twitter or a thousand views on Boro Fan TV.
At the end of the day, a loud and passionate Riverside atmosphere and positive, attack-oriented football is what will be most enjoyable as a Boro fan next season, especially after the one that has just gone. As such, success should not be placed as far ahead of enjoyment as it was under Pulis. That applies to us as fans as well as those in the dugout and boardroom.
Similarly, we do not possess a God-given right or a neo-Erastian entitlement to be a Premier League club. Only if we shake off this quasi-nationalistic baggage can we thrive as a football club which represents and entertains the people from whom it originated and to whom its future belongs.
To those who say appointing Woody lacks ambition, I ask what is more ambitious than going against the grain and doing the opposite of what is expected in pursuit of sustainable long-term success by placing trust in a relatively inexperienced, but nonetheless well-qualified, Boro lad?
He deserves to be backed. Let’s go and do it.

Woodgate: An Ambitious Appointment Which Heralds a New Era and Deserves to be Backed

Thursday, May 23, 2019

By Tim Sigsworth
With Tony Pulis’ time as Boro manager well and truly over, speculation over who will be next to take to the Riverside hotseat has been running rife in the papers and on social media.
Despite the well-proven likes of Slavisa Jokanovic, Chris Hughton and Nigel Pearson (along with the less well-proven Gabriel Batistuta) attracting considerable attention from fans, journalists and bookmakers alike at varying points, Jonathan Woodgate has emerged as the consistent frontrunner for the role.
However, from the ever-confrontational Boro Twitter to the reactionary war-zone that is the Gazette’s comment section, this development has been met with widespread condemnation from many and derisory abuse from a minority.
Legitimate, reasoned criticisms of the potential appointment generally involve his history with the club and the current squad, his lack of previous managerial experience and his perceived style of play.
Negative interpretations of these three topics have dominated the discourse surrounding Woodgate and are what I will seek to counter, along with some elements of misinformation, in this article. Whether you agree with my opinions or not, I hope you recognise that my intention is to widen the conversation, not mock or disregard those who hold reasoned opinions to the contrary.
Improper Working Relationships and Jobs for the Boys
Woodgate’s previous coaching experience involves being a first-team coach under both Steve Agnew (one month) and Tony Pulis (seventeen months) and an assistant manager to Mark Tinkler with Boro’s U18s (four months). As such, he has spent the entirety of his professional coaching career at Rockcliffe Park.
Furthermore, several current squad members – Dimi, George Friend, Dael Fry, Daniel Ayala, Adam Clayton and Stewart Downing – are his former teammates, whilst the latter’ sister is Woodgate’s wife.
These circumstances have led to some arguing that Woodgate would be unable to maintain an effective working relationship as manager due to his close relationships with former teammates and with Boro’s top brass, who were likely important in securing the only coaching positions the now 39-year-old has ever held.
However, although his position as first-team coach probably involves more informal interactions with players than the position of manager would, it nevertheless requires a certain level of seniority and authority which, after seventeen months in the role, will be well-affirmed.
Moreover, his position within the Boro squad during the final years of his playing career was a senior one, with his experience at the top-level of the game and his captaincy of the club granting him a position of relative power, influence and respect among his teammates which would be conducive to the emergence of trust in and support for him as a manager.
It is not as if he is transitioning from player to manager in the same overnight way that Gareth Southgate did to ill-effect in 2006.
Accusations of matey-ness with those who would become his players therefore appear wide of the mark, especially given Stewart Downing’s inevitable departure at the end of this season and that leadership does not always have to be authoritarian. Rather, his relationship with the squad seems to me to be a factor in his favour – he possesses intimate knowledge of a squad which respects him as a figure of authority.
Similarly, his established relationship with the club also seems to me to be a positive.
Born and bred on Teesside and raised as a Boro fan, Woodgate not only understands the area, its people and the importance of enjoyable football to it but also, thanks to his experience within the club and its academy, the club’s philosophy, its ethos and the need to build on Pulis’ unifying internal reforms to create a long-term plan facilitative of a pathway from the academy to the first-team and indicative of the club’s long history in that regard.
His potential appointment would not be one borne out of the Hurworth Hierarchy’s supposed affinity for ‘jobs for the boys’, but one borne out of suitability.
Why should he get the job? Who’s he managed before?
Fair enough. Woodgate has never held a managerial position before. Although he took charge of Boro’s first team for friendlies against Rochdale and Hartlepool United last summer and, as explored above, is well-versed in the workings of MFC, that doesn’t make for the best reading.
Nevertheless, there are plenty of examples of inexperienced managers being successful from both the club’s history and the modern game.
Jack Charlton, Bryan Robson and Gareth Southgate all transitioned from players to successful Middlesbrough managers (less so in Southgate’s case) without any of the coaching experience that Woody boasts, whilst Steve McClaren and Aitor Karanka had spent more time coaching at a higher-level than Woodgate but had never managed before achieving success as first-time managers with Boro.
More recently, Lee Bowyer at Charlton Athletic, Graham Potter at Östersunds FK and Garry Monk at Swansea City have all achieved relative success without previous managerial or, in some cases, even coaching experience, let alone the playing career that Woodgate has had and the managers he has played for.
Woodgate also has experience as a scout, having worked as one for Liverpool in Spain and Portugal from the summer of 2016 to spring 2017. With experience in talent identification in two nations which a cost-effective recruitment strategy would inevitably look to exploit, this appears to suit the reformed, rough diamond-focused transfer policy which Boro look to be heading towards.
Accordingly, his experience as a coach, a scout and a top-level player lends itself to the potential for success, whilst similarly or less experienced managers have been successful at Boro and in the modern game before. As such, managerial experience isn’t the be all and end all in Woody’s case – although it obviously does help.
We’re sick of shite football, why would we want Pulis 2.0?
Another argument doing the rounds has been an assumption that because Woodgate has spent the vast majority of his coaching career working with Pulis, he will look to play the same torrid football that Boro’s supporters grew to despise last season.
Irrespective of him being in tune with supporter desires as a Boro lad and having spent time working as a coach in Boro’s possession-favouring academy and as a scout for Jurgen Klopp’s far-from-defensive Liverpool side, statements from Woodgate and those close to him contradict the assertion that he would be a Pulis 2.0.
On BBC Tees last Friday (17/05/19) Neil Maddison, a former Boro midfielder and current player liaison officer at the club, commented on the Woodgate speculation and dismissed claims that his relationship with Pulis would leave him inclined to play a safety-first, Pulis-esque style of football.
“Working under Tony Pulis, it's the manager's head on the block, you might say, 'I think you're wrong gaffer', but it's the manager's head on the chopping block and he'll go the way he thinks.
"I've talked to Woody a few times regarding how the team played and I remember him saying 'I love to see teams press and get in the face of the opposition'. So he might have a different philosophy and style of play.
“He understands the club and he understands the way it's got to be played in terms of last season what happened.”
Curtis Fleming, also a first-team coach under Pulis, echoed Maddo’s sentiment in an interview with BBC Tees on Tuesday (21/05/19).
“I think first and foremost Woody is a great lad. He works hard. He’s been at the Academy. He’s played at the top level. He knows the club. He’s a Boro lad and a Boro fan.
“It is a different kettle of fish stepping up the manager’s job but look at the lads who have stepped up this year: Lee Bowyer at Charlton, Scott Parker at Fulham, Frank Lampard and Derby. People talk about experience but it is about belief.
“Woody wants to play good football, he’s worked with some great coaches and he’s a good coach himself.
“It’s a totally different thing being No. 1 but no-one will know until you get the chance to do it.”
Furthermore, Woodgate himself spoke of his footballing philosophy with reference to then-manager Aitor Karanka in an interview with the Football League Paper in October 2015.
“The manager has been fantastic for me from day one here. It’s the same for all of the players. He has changed the club’s philosophy in terms of wanting to win every game, even every training session.
“If we lose a game we really know about it. Everybody is disappointed when it happens, but with this bloke it really is like World War Three.
“That’s something I will learn from him, which is how it should be. He is certainly the man to take the club forward.”
Regardless of misconceptions that Karanka-era football was similar to Pulis’, a philosophy of wanting to win every game contrasts starkly with Pulis’ football and suggests that Woodgate would likely introduce an enjoyable style of play without sacrificing defensive solidity as Garry Monk did.
Therefore, on the basis of those three quotes, a Woodgate-managed team featuring hungry, dynamic youngsters could actually be a quite attractive prospect.
Conclusion
Change is required at the club if last season’s 7th placed finish is to be built upon and if our financial resources shrink as predicted but what Boro don’t need is an expensive and time-costly iconoclastic overhaul which threatens the vehicles for long-term success introduced during Pulis’ ill-fated reign.
In that context, Woodgate is a solid option who, though he may not guarantee short-term success, will likely ensure the conception and implementation of a long-term, club-wide plan (if it isn’t already in place) which will set the club up well for the mid-to-long-term future and satisfy supporter desires in the short-term with an attractive style of play and the promotion of academy players to the first team.
Appointing a proven Championship or even a proven Premier League manager does not come without risks, the appointments of Garry Monk, Tony Pulis and even Gordon Strachan prove this. That isn’t to say that appointing Woodgate doesn’t come without risks, but they are certainly minimised by his knowledge of the club and his suitability to the noises which are coming from the club in terms of providing opportunities to academy players and implementing a cost-effective, foreign or lower league-focused recruitment model.
Perhaps he isn’t ready to become manager just yet. I’d certainly agree that Slavisa Jokanovic seems a better appointment in that the risk of failure appears lower and that his managerial experience and previous successes far outweigh Woodgate’s. By a long way.
What I don’t agree with is arguments against his appointment being made on the grounds of misinformation and assumed weaknesses rather than the known experience- and track record-based strengths of someone like Jokanovic.
Given that Woodgate hasn’t been removed from the club as other members of Pulis’ backroom staff have, it seems probable that he will remain a member of the new manager’s coaching team or perhaps be promoted to assistant manager. In context of the factors referenced throughout this piece, that can hardly be a dangerous prospect.
However, if he is appointed as manager, he deserves to be given a two-to-three year chance of developing his team and as a manager – his suitability to the club’s current circumstances, often incorrectly or dubiously criticised, stands as testament to that.

Woodgate v. The People (2019): Defending a Prospective Boro Manager